Happiest Countries are the LEAST Religious

Denmark, Switzerland, Norway and Finland: These are four of the *least* religious countries in the world, and they ranked in the top four of the World Happiness Index. We have a lot to learn to improve our nation, my fellow Americans.

And religious people, why do you think your “god” has allowed these countries to be so much better off than we are in America? There is no “god” taught or promoted in the public schools or government in these countries. They are far safer, healthier, and happier than we are in the U.S. Makes ya think, doesn’t it? ? —

“Four different countries have held top spot in the four most recent reports- Denmark, Switzerland, Norway and now Finland.”


Abstinence-Only Propaganda Promoted by Christian Fundamentalist Zealots in Trump Administration, Despite Evidence, In Secret

Christian fundamentalists have power in this country and do not care about facts or evidence. They are willing to cause harm to others and refuse to consider the data regarding effectiveness and consequences of their decisions. They also do not want to be exposed, hence why the make hasty decisions behind closed doors. There’s no logic or rationality whatsoever. Just pure religious fundamentalist fear, judgment, shaming, and their own narrow, closed-minded, strict conservative religious beliefs about “morality.” —-


From the article, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/notes-emails-reveal-trump-appointees-war-end-hhs-teen-pregnancy-n857686

“The Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of a federal program to prevent teen pregnancy last year was directed by political appointees over the objections of career experts in the Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the program, according to internal notes and emails obtained by NBC News.

The trove shows three appointees with strict pro-abstinence beliefs — including Victoria Huber, the then-chief of staff for the department’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health — guided the process to end a program many medical professionals credit with helping to bring the nation’s teen pregnancy rate to an all-time low.

Prior to serving at HHS, Huber was the president of Ascend, an association that promotes abstinence until marriage as the best way to prevent teen pregnancy.

The $213 million Teen Pregnancy Program was aimed at helping teenagers understand how to avoid unwanted pregnancies. It had bipartisan support in Congress and trained more than 7,000 health professionals and supported 3,000 community-based organizations since its inception in 2010.
In the notes provided to NBC News, Evelyn Kappeler, who for eight years has led the Office of Adolescent Health, which administers the program, repeatedly expressed concerns about terminating the program, but appeared out of the decision-making loop and at one point was driven to tears.

In a July 17, 2017 note, she says she was admonished to “get in line” and told it was not her place to ask questions about the agency’s use of funds. In a July 28 note, Kappeler recalled she was “frustrated about the time this process is taking and the fact that (her staff) has not been part of the discussions.” She described being “so rattled” that “my reaction when I got on (sic) the phone was to cry.”

She and her staff “were not aware of the grant action until the last minute” — an apparent reference to the decision, it says.
Last month, Democracy Forward, a nonprofit law firm and advocacy group, sued the administration for unlawfully terminating the program after the agency took months to respond to its Freedom of Information Act request.

The group claims the newly obtained emails show that HHS violated the Administrative Procedure Act that bars arbitrary decision-making and that the political appointees thwarted the will of Congress.
“Now that we’ve seen these documents, there is no question to us why the Trump administration withheld” the emails, said Skye Perryman, the group’s lawyer. The decision to end the program “was made hastily, without a record of any reasoned decision making and under the influence of political appointees who have long opposed evidenced-based policy,” she said.